Tam (2000), states “The
constructivist perspective supports that learners learn through interaction
with others. Learners work together as peers, applying their combined knowledge
to the solution of the problem. The dialogue that results from this combined
effort provides learners with the opportunity to test and refine their
understanding in an ongoing process.” Laney
(1990) reported that “computers were effective in developing higher-order
thinking skills, including defining problems, judging information, solving the
problems, and drawing appropriate conclusions. The computer can serve in the
process of information gathering, inquiry, and collaboration, not merely as a
vestige of direct instruction with its reliance on integrating technology in
the existing curriculum (Rice & Wilson, 1999). Technology tools that aid in
case-based learning include various types of simulation and strategy
software/CD-Roms, video discs, multimedia/hypermedia, and telecommunications
(e-mail and Internet).”
In a recent meta-analysis of
distance and online learning, Bernard et al. (2009) quantitatively verified the
importance of three types of interaction: among students, between the
instructor and students, and between students and course content (Abrami, et.,
al.). Abrami, et., al. (2011), states “Not surprisingly, the major conclusion
from Bernard et al. (2009) was that designing interaction treatments into DE
courses, whether to increase interaction with the material to be learned, with
the course instructor, or with peers impacts positively on student learning.
But are even larger and more consistently positive effects possible? It may be
that the presence of the interaction conditions in the reviewed studies
functioned in exactly the way they were intended, so that the estimates of the
effects were fairly accurate.” The document
URL is:
http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/880032148?accountid=14872
When doing a search for
professional blogs concerning technology and collaboration, I came across the
Common Classroom: The Common Sense Education Blog. One of the postings in this blog addressed the
topic of how technology can encourage student collaboration (https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/blog/how-technology-can-encourage-student-collaboration). I found it interesting when the author stated
“The theory behind the move to use technology to expand collaboration relies on
both social science and recent developments in cognitive science that help us
better understand the learning process. In 2004, the National Academy of
Sciences published the seminal book How People Learn, which integrates
cognitive science with recommended learning environments.” After reading the blog posts I began to think
how I could add more technology to my own curriculum in my licensed home child
care.
Definitely food for thought.
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamin, R. M. (2011).
Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve
practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 82-103.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
Baumeister, R. F. (2012).
Need-to-belong theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume Two, 121-140.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J.
(1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing
critical features from an instructional
design perspective. Performance
Improvement
Quarterly, 6(4),
50–71.
How Technology Can Encourage
Student Collaboration. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/blog/how-technology-can-encourage-student-
collaboration
Laney, D. (1990). Microcomputers
and the social studies. OCSS Review, 26, 30-37.
Rheingold, H. (2008, February).
Howard Rheingold on collaboration [Video file]. Retrieved
from http://www.ted.com/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html
Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism,
instructional design, and technology: Implications for
transforming distance learning.
Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/3_2/tam.html
-
- - - - - - - - -
anitaboseman@wordpress.com
http://travalper.blogspot.com.br/
learningtheoryedu7105.wordpress.com
Your posting is very thorough and it was a pleasure doing the collaboration with you.
ReplyDeleteI think one of the things we can both take away from this assignment is the knowledge that there is a wealth of technological innovations and resources for the educator either as a single individual or for schools and districts to use. There is no reason why a teacher or school system would not be able to find something to enhance the student’s classroom experience and opportunities for learning.
Anita
I agree.
ReplyDeleteHi Robin,
ReplyDeleteI agree that technology provides us with many platforms where we can collaboratively resolve issues. Computers can help us access data and keep them, sort them and use them when necessary. They can be utilized as ancillary tools in education based on constructivist ideas as I think that the social face to face interaction should be the main form of contact.
On the other hand, they help us realize meetings that would otherwise be impossible such as me from Brazil, another individual from China and someone in US being able discuss our views on academic issues and even put together an assignment collaboratively. This collaboration definitely adds to human beings collective data base.