“It seems to me that each _ism is offering
something useful without any of them being
complete or stand alone in their own right.”
~ Kapp (2007)
Gardner (1985) defines cognitive
science “as a contemporary, empirically based effort to answer long-standing
epistemological questions – particularly those concerned with efforts to
explain human knowledge.”
Driscoll (2005) states,
“According to the cognitive information processing view, the human learner is
conceived to be a processor of information in much the same way a computer
is.” Driscoll (2005) continues by stating
“When learning occurs, information is input from the environment, processed and
stored in memory, and output in the form of some learned capability.” From a cognivist’s point of view knowledge is
acquired through an interaction with sense information as an active agent. Cognivist’s believe that our minds are what
frames experience and perception. They
also believe our minds provide potential boundaries for knowledge based on its
innate construction and capacity (Reynlolds, et al, 1996, pg. 97).
Cognitive theory became more widely accepted in place of
behaviorist theory in the 1970s after the influence of cognitive science began
to make itself known in the educational technology field. This awareness began when publications that
focused on the cognitive view of learning and its application began to find
their way into the educational technology field (i.e. Atkinson, 1976)
(Saettler, 2004).
The more I am exposed to the different theories of education
the more I cannot seem to pick just one that I feel is the best fit for me as
an educator. Kapp (2007) states in his
blog that “We need to take pieces from each school of thought and apply it
effectively because Cognitivism does not explain 100% how humans process
information and neither does Constructivism or Behaviorism. What we need to is take the best from each
philosophy and use it wisely to create solid educational experiences for our
learners.” I also have to agree with Kerr
(2007) when he states “What I have noticed is that these _isms do not stand
still. They evolve, they listen to
criticism and move on. I’ve also noticed
that learning theorists, who have a different favorite _ism to mine, might
still come up with significant findings in their empirical studies that I find
hard to reject or ignore.”
Maybe someday in the future I will be able to pick one _ism
and advocate for it. However, today is
not that day. I am the type of person
who needs to do my research before deciding on taking a stance on any
issue. The choice of an _ism is no
different.
References
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New
York, NY: Basic Books.
Irby, B. J., Brown, G., Lara-Alecio, R., &
Jackson, S. (2013). Cognitivism: Ways of knowing. In The
handbook of educational theories (pp. 105-113).
Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.
Kapp, K. (2007,
January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log
and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Kerr, B. (2007,
January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Reynolds,
R. E., Sinatra, G. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). Views of knowledge
acquisition and
representation: A continuum from experience centered to mind
centered. Educational
Psychologist,
31(2), 93-104.
Saettler,
L. P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology.
Englewood, CO:
IAP, Information
Age Publishing.
Tomic, W.
(1993). Behaviorism and cognitivism in education. A
Journal of Human Behavior. Vol
30, Pp. 34-46.
- - - - - - - - - -
Blogs I posted comments to
anitaboseman.wordpress.com
travalper.blogspot.com
joanierice.weebly.com
Robin,
ReplyDeleteI agree with that idea of a piece from each _ism as well. However, I do not believe that we will ever really understand the nature of human learning. I believe that not everyone learns in the same manner which is why there are so many _isms. It may take someone a week to learn a computer program but take someone else, one day. I just feel like even with all of the _isms that are out there, one still cannot actually state how people learn. That's just my opinion.