Durrington et al. (2006) notes in order to encourage high
student interactivity in an online/distance learning forum, the learning
environment must be supportive, open, and respectful. Ways in which this can be accomplished
are:
- providing a detailed syllabus that clearly defines
expectations for the course in general and specific guidelines for each
assignment
- creating a discussion area where students post their
questions and the instructor posts answers
- timeliness in responding to students questions (the tone
of the responses is also important from the instructor as well as other
students).
- instructor-mediated discussions support student
interactivity and enhance individual performance and satisfaction.
- asking students questions directly related to their
postings also encourages more in-depth participation.
- student-moderated discussions (i.e. discussion section of
community blog).
Anderson (2008) notes the theoretical model developed by
Garrison, Anderson, and Archer views the creation of an effective online
educational community as involving three critical components. These components are: cognitive presence, social presence, and
teaching presence (Anderson, 2008).
When reviewing the component of teaching presence, Anderson
(2008) notes teaching presence is an important factor in order to be an
effective online instructor. Critical
components needed are: design and
organization, facilitating discourse, and direct instruction. The process of creating an effective teacher
presence begins by providing students with access and motivation (Anderson,
2008). The instructor begins this
process by addressing any technical or social issues that may inhibit
participation. It is also important that
students are given the opportunity (and are encouraged) to share information
about themselves to create a virtual presence (i.e. introductions in the class
café).
Anderson (2008) notes the process continues with the second
stage. In this stage the e-moderator
continues to develop online socialization.
Anderson (2008) states this is accomplished by “building bridges between
cultural, social, and learning environments.”
Anderson (2008) states the process continues with the third
stage. This stage is the information
exchange stage which “the teaching task moves to facilitating learning tasks,
moderating content-based discussions, and bringing to light student
misconceptions and misunderstandings” (Anderson, 2008, p. 359).
Anderson (2008 p. 359) states the process continues with the
fourth stage. This stage is knowledge
construction “students focus on creating knowledge artefacts and projects that
collaboratively and individually illustrate their understanding of course
content and approaches.”
Anderson (2008, p. 359-360) states the last stage is
considered to be the development stage.
In this stage “learners become responsible for their own and their
group’s learning by creating final projects, working on summative assignments,
and demonstrating the achievement of learning outcomes.”
Personally, I see a connection between my own successful
experiences with online classes and what the research has shown. All the tools listed in the graphic organizer
above have played a key role in my own successful experiences. I am now working on my fourth degree in an
online/distance learning format. I have
had many more positive experiences versus negative experiences during these
degree programs. The positive experiences have the same elements in common (i.e.
detailed syllabus, class café, ask the instructor section, discussion boards,
group activities, etc.). The negative
experiences are missing the elements of the positive experiences. Also, because this is my fourth degree in an
online/distance learning format, I have also seen the process evolve over the
years (approximately between seven and eight years).
Johnson & Aragon (2003) states “There seems to be an
assumed separation between knowing and doing in education, whereby knowing is
valued over doing, and mental activity is valued over physical activity. However, cognitive theorists have challenged
this perspective because the activities through which learning occurs are
inseparable from cognition. In order for
online instruction to be successful, some form of learner activity must be included.”
References
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of
online learning. (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB:
Athabasca University Press.
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006).
Strategies for enhancing student interactivity
in an online environment.
College
Teaching, 54(1), 190−193.
Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional
strategy framework for online learning environments.
New Directions for
Adult & Continuing
Education, (100), 31-43.
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in
networks: Changing roles for educators and
designers. ITForum.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Blogs I posted to:
http://brandyhiett.wordpress.com/
http://sportz75.wordpress.com/
Blogs I posted to:
http://brandyhiett.wordpress.com/
http://sportz75.wordpress.com/
Hi Robin, your blog was very informative and detailed! I also like the way your graphic organizer turned out. You used both tools and strategies for your examples. As I completed this assignment, I saw a large overlap of the areas of communication and collaboration when I tried to differentiate between the tools and strategies for each.
ReplyDeleteI noticed that as well. At times I was wondering which category I would place some of them. Many serve multiple purposes. :)
DeleteGreat post Robin,
ReplyDeleteI must agree that it seems that Walden took the blueprint from this research to create their courses. You have some interesting alignment in your organizer. Is there anything that could have been performed to neutralize the negative experience that you had in the online setting?
Thanks for commenting on my posting. :) The one thing that would have been really helpful would have been to have the rubric. There is just something about being told to "do the assignment my way" when you talk to the professor with no direction as to what his way is.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your informative blog on tools and strategies of supporting student engagement in an online environment. I noticed that the tools that you included as examples of "content" were very different from what I included, which helped me to broaden my perspective on this area. For instance, I only thought of content as those sites such as Khan Academy and Wikipedia that contain various forms of content knowledge and information that students can use to enhance their learning independently. As Siemens reminds us that with today's new technological tools the teacher no longer is in control of knowledge and interaction domains, and that the classroom walls have become permeable.
ReplyDelete