Wednesday, December 11, 2013

MODULE 1 - BLOG POST ASSIGNMENT


“We need technology in every classroom and in every 
student and teacher’s hand, because it is the pen
and paper of our time, and it is the lens through
which we experience much of our world.”
                                                                        ~ David Warlick

For this week’s assignment we were asked to read three articles by Moller, Huett, Foshay and Coleman.  Then we needed to listen to the Simonson video programs.  Once this was completed we were asked to compare and contrast the reasons these authors believe there is a need to evolve distance education to the next generation.  We were then asked whether or not we agree with their positions and explain why or why not?

Michael Simonson stated “Today, distance education is widely adopted and approaching critical mass in society (Laureate, 2008a)”.  Advantages of distance education (DE) are, but not limited to: provides equivalent learning experiences to those in face-to-face instruction; possibly offer increased return on investment for institutions; students may gain by not having to drive to campus or give up jobs; possibly increase a student’s motivation to learn; and provide increased access for students (Laureate, 2008b). 

In regards to the Moller, Huett, Foshay and Coleman articles, there is also positive reference by the authors about moving forward with distance education to the next generation (Moller et al., 2008).  All seem to agree that there will be challenges in evolving the field as well as challenges in assuring that the “products of sound professional design practice lead the e-learning enterprise” (Moller, et al., 2008).  Examples of these challenges are, but not limited to:  Making sure online learning experiences are equivalent to face-to-face classroom experiences (Simonson, 2000);  policymakers need to understand the value of distance education, especially in the K-12 learning sector (Huett et al., 2008);  and finding methods that focus on the best way to facilitate learning (Simonson, 2000).

I agree with the positions stated above.  I personally have earned three degrees in a distance education online environment.  When I was working on my BA I had the pleasure of being enrolled in UMASS Amherst’s University Without Walls program.  This was the first time I took any online courses, let alone earning an entire degree.  My two MS degrees were earned with Walden University.  During the last seven years I have seen distance education evolving (i.e. it is now more accepted, the offered degrees are greater in numbers, etc.).  I can only imagine what distance education is going to be like in the future.

References
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October). The evolution of  

          distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web

          (Part 3: K12). TechTrends, 52(5). 63-67. 

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008a). Distance Education: The next generation.  [Video   

          webcast].  Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.

          jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%

          2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_4079298_1%26url%3D

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008b). Equivalency Theory. [Video webcast].  Retrieved  

          from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_

          1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3D

          Course%26id%3D_4079298_1%26url%3D

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June). The evolution of distance education:

          Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and

          development). TechTrends, 52(3), 70-75.

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June). The evolution of distance education:

          Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher education).

          TechTrends, 52(4), 66-70.

Simonson, M. (2000). Making decisions: The use of electronic technology in online classes. New

          Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 29-34.
_________________________________________________________________________________

BLOGS I COMMENTED ON FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

http://hjbrent.blogspot.com
sportz75.wordpress.com
http://brandyhiett.wordpress.com
http://clgrisby.edublogs.org/?p=54
http://techdiva29.wordpress.com

2 comments:

  1. Good blog! I also agreed with the assessment given by the resources this week. One thing that you alluded to but did not detail was the equivalency theory by Dr. Simonson (Laureate Education Inc., 2008). What are some ways that we as future leaders in distance education can pursue the equivalency of face-to-face education and distance education.
    Thanks,
    Brandy Hiett

    Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008b). Equivalency Theory. [Video webcast]. Retrieved

    from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_

    1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3D

    Course%26id%3D_4079298_1%26url%3D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brandy/Robin. I picked up on that fact that many models exist to support teaching and student learning, with respect to online instructional tools. I believe there were stark differences in the methodology used to support classroom teaching (face-to-face, vs. e-learning), that do not mesh with the online instruction models. I also read that site-based online instruction is most preferred by schools incorporating distance learning into the curriculum. So, equivalency to me means being able to best meet the instructional needs of students. It may not be just one or the other. To me, there is a different set of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of one verses the other. As long as the outcomes are the same, and they are reached successfully, but even the most challenged learners. How can we assess mastery of content with online programs?

    ReplyDelete